首页> 外文OA文献 >Laparoscopically assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: a prospective randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Laparoscopically assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: a prospective randomized controlled trial

机译:腹腔镜辅助的脑室-腹膜分流术:一项前瞻性随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECT In ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt surgery, laparoscopic assistance can be used for placement of the peritoneal catheter. Until now, the efficacy of laparoscopic shunt placement has been investigated only in retrospective and nonrandomized prospective studies, which have reported decreased distal shunt dysfunction rates in patients undergoing laparascopic placement compared with mini-laparotomy cohorts. In this randomized controlled trial the authors compared rates of shunt failure in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for peritoneal catheter placement with rates in patients who underwent traditional mini-laparotomy. METHODS One hundred twenty patients scheduled for VP shunt surgery were randomized to laparoscopic surgery or mini-laparotomy for insertion of the peritoneal catheter. The primary endpoint was the rate of overall shunt complication or failure within the first 12 months after surgery. Secondary endpoints were distal shunt failure, overall complication/ failure, duration of surgery and hospitalization, and morbidity. RESULTS The overall shunt complication/failure rate was 15% (9 of 60 cases) in the laparoscopic group and 18.3% (11 of 60 cases) in the mini-laparotomy group (p = 0.404). Patients in the laparoscopic group had no distal shunt failures; in contrast, 5 (8%) of 60 patients in the mini-laparotomy group experienced distal shunt failure (p = 0.029). Intraoperative complications occurred in 2 patients (both in the laparoscopic group), and abdominal pain led to catheter removal in 1 patient per group. Infections occurred in 1 patient in the laparoscopic group and 3 in the mini-laparotomy group. The mean durations of surgery and hospitalization were similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS While overall shunt failure rates were similar in the 2 groups, the use of laparoscopic shunt placement significantly reduced the rate of distal shunt failure compared with mini-laparotomy.
机译:目的在进行腹膜腔(VP)分流手术时,可以使用腹腔镜辅助来放置腹膜导管。迄今为止,仅在回顾性和非随机性前瞻性研究中对腹腔镜分流放置的疗效进行了研究,这些研究报告说,与小型腹腔镜手术组相比,腹腔镜分流的患者远端分流功能障碍率降低了。在这项随机对照试验中,作者比较了接受腹腔镜腹膜置管手术的患者的分流失败率与接受传统小型腹腔镜手术的患者的分流失败率。方法将计划进行VP分流手术的120例患者随机分为腹腔镜手术或小切口开腹手术以插入腹膜导管。主要终点是术后头12个月内总分流并发症或失败的发生率。次要终点为远端分流失败,总体并发症/失败,手术和住院时间以及发病率。结果腹腔镜组的总分流并发症/失败率为15%(60例中的9例),迷你腹腔镜手术组的总分流并发症/失败率为18.3%(60例中的11例)(p = 0.404)。腹腔镜组的患者没有远端分流失败。相比之下,小型腹腔镜手术组60例患者中有5例(8%)经历了远端分流失败(p = 0.029)。术中并发症发生在2例患者(均在腹腔镜组),腹痛导致每组1例患者拔除导管。腹腔镜组1例患者发生感染,小腹腔镜组3例发生感染。两组的平均手术时间和住院时间相似。结论尽管两组的总分流失败率相似,但与小型腹腔镜开腹术相比,腹腔镜分流器放置的使用显着降低了远端分流器的失败率。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号